Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/1508/2013 Of M/S. Mercury Developer...

Itxa/1508/2013 Of M/S. Mercury Developers,Mumbai-400 059 v. Commissioner Of Income Tax,Mumbai

High Court 31 Jul 2014 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/1508/2013 Of M/S. Mercury Developers,Mumbai-400 059 v. Commissioner Of Income Tax,Mumbai
Date of order
31 Jul 2014
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Itxa/1508/2013 Of M/S. Mercury Developers,Mumbai-400 059 v. Commissioner Of Income Tax,Mumbai, the High Court (2014) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: DATE :- 31[st] July, 2014 P.C.: 1 The learned counsel appearing for the Appellant/ Assessee states that the Assessee has instructed her to seek leave to withdraw the Appeal in view of compounding of the offence by the Assessee.2In the light of these instructions received and the statement made, the...

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
kps IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1508 OF 2013 M/s Mercury Developers, Mumbai.-Versus-Commissioner of Income Tax. ..Appellant ..Respondent ........... Ms.Pragati Salpe i/by Ms.Beena Pillai, for the Appellant. ........... CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARIAND B.P. COLABAWALLA, JJ. DATE :- 31[st] July, 2014 P.C.: 1 The learned counsel appearing for the Appellant/ Assessee states that the Assessee has instructed her to seek leave to withdraw the Appeal in view of compounding of the offence by the Assessee.2In the light of these instructions received and the statement made, the Appeal is allowed to be withdrawn and is disposed of as such. No costs. (B.P. COLABAWALLA, J.) (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan