Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/1524/2010 Of He Commissioner Of Inc...

Itxa/1524/2010 Of He Commissioner Of Income-Tax-3,Mum v. M/S Sandoz Texiles Trading Pvt Ltd

High Court 30 Apr 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/1524/2010 Of He Commissioner Of Income-Tax-3,Mum v. M/S Sandoz Texiles Trading Pvt Ltd
Date of order
30 Apr 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itxa/1524/2010 Of He Commissioner Of Income-Tax-3,Mum v. M/S Sandoz Texiles Trading Pvt Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2860/2007 IN ITXA (L) NO.1280/2007 (The CIT Mumbai V/s.M/s.Sandoz Textiles & Trading Ltd.) ____________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memo- ¦ -randa of Coram, Apperances¦ Court’s or Judges Orders Courts orders or directions¦ and Prothonotary’s orders ¦ -------------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & A.V.NIRGUDE, JJ. DATE30th April, 2008P.C.: A.V.NIRGUDE, JJ. : DATE30th April, 2008 : DATE : DATE P.C.: . Heard the learned Counsel Mr.Vimal Gupta with Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the Appellant & Mr.J.D.Mistri with Mr.Raj Darak for Respondent. By this Notice of Motion, the Appellant is seeking condonation of 588 days’ delay caused in filing the Appeal. It appears that though the Chief Commissioner of Income Tax had granted approval for filing an Appeal on 17.8.2005 the Appeal came to be filed belatedly on 12.6.2007. The reasons given for delay that of getting the Appeal Memo drafted and the causes beyond the control of the appellant’s office etc. does not appear to be justifiable. No sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay. Hence, Notice of Motion stands dismissed. 2. In view of dismissal of the Notice of Motion, Income Tax Appeal (L) No.1280/2007 also stands dismissed. (A.V.NIRGUDE, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (A.V.NIRGUDE, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (A.V.NIRGUDE, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan