Itxa/1531/2013 Of Index Equities Private Limited v. Dy. Commissioner Of Income-Tax 2(2
High Court
20 Jan 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/1531/2013 Of Index Equities Private Limited v. Dy. Commissioner Of Income-Tax 2(2
Date of order
20 Jan 2021
Assessment year(s)
2007-08
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Itxa/1531/2013 Of Index Equities Private Limited v. Dy. Commissioner Of Income-Tax 2(2, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.
Decision: Accordingly, the appeal is disposed of as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYO.O.C.J.
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1531 OF 2013
Index Equities Pvt Ltd..AppellantVersus
Dy. Commissioner of Income-tax 2(2)
..Respondent
...................
Ms. Jasmine Amalsadvala i/by Mint & Confreres for the Appellant Ms. Jasmine Amalsadvala i/by Mint & Confreres for the Appellant Mr. Akhileshkumar Sharma for the Respondent Mr. Akhileshkumar Sharma for the Respondent
...................
CORAM : UJJAL BHUYAN &
MILIND N. JADHAV, JJ.
DATE : JANUARY 20, 2021.
P.C.:
Heard Ms. Amalsadvala, learned counsel for theappellant and Mr. Sharma, learned standing counsel revenuefor the respondent.
2. This appeal under section 260A of the Income Tax Act,1961 has been preferred by the assessee as the appellantagainst the order dated 27.02.2013 passed by the IncomeTax Appellate Tribunal, 'I' Bench, Mumbai in I.T.A. No. 6159/Mum/2010 for the assessment year 2007-08.
3.The appeal was admitted by this Court on 21.04.2015on the substantial question of law framed in the said order.
4.Today the appeal is before us on a praecipe filed bylearned counsel for the appellant.
5.It is submitted that Parliament has enacted the DirectTax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020 (briefly 'the Act' hereinafter)providing for a scheme for resolution of tax disputes.Appellant has filed a declaration under section 3 of the saidAct before the Designated Authority which had thereafterissued a certificate under section 5(1) of the said Act on12.01.2021 determining the tax payable at nil to theappellant. However, for passing of the final order undersection 5(2) of the said Act, appellant is required to withdrawthe appeal in terms of section 4(3) thereof. Hence, theprayer for withdrawal of the appeal.
6.Learned counsel for the respondent has no objection tothe prayer made for withdrawal of the appeal.
7.Considering the above, we allow the appellant towithdraw the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is disposed of
as withdrawn.
8.Refund as per Rules.
[ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ] [ UJJAL BHUYAN, J. ]
Digitally signedRavindraby Ravindra M.AmberkarM.Date:Amberkar2021.01.2111:48:28+0530
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.