Itxa/1532/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-7 v. M/S. Sajjan India Ltd
High Court
11 Feb 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/1532/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-7 v. M/S. Sajjan India Ltd
Date of order
11 Feb 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itxa/1532/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-7 v. M/S. Sajjan India Ltd, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 3.Accordingly, all these Appeals are dismissed as not pressed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
Priya Soparkar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1532 OF 2014
The Commissioner of Income Tax-7
V/s.
M/s Sajjan India Ltd.
… Appellant
… Respondent
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2312 OF 2013
The Commissioner of Income Tax 5… Appellant
V/s.
M/s Narang Overseas Pvt. Ltd.
… Respondent
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.629 OF 2015
The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-8 … Appellant
V/s.
M/s. Sajjan India Limited
… Respondent
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.77 OF 2016
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-5… Appellant
V/s.
M/s Storewell Credit and Capital Pvt. Ltd. … Respondent
---
Mr.N.C.Mohanty for the Appellants.
Mr.Sanjiv M. Shah for the Respondents in ITXA Nos.1532 of 2014and 629 of 2015.
Ms.Aarti Sathe for the Respondent in ITXA No.77 of 2016.
---
Priya Soparkar
CORAM : AKIL KURESHI AND
B.P.COLABAWALLA, JJ.
DATE : FEBRUARY 11, 2019.
P.C.:-
1.These Appeals under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act,
1961 (the Act) challenge the orders passed by the Income TaxAppellate Tribunal (the Tribunal).
2.Mr.N.C.Mohanty, learned Counsel appearing for theRevenue states that he has been instructed not to press theseappeals. This for the reason that the tax effect in each of theseappeals is less than Rs.50 lakhs as provided in CBDT Circular No.3of 2018 dated 11[th] July, 2018.
3.Accordingly, all these Appeals are dismissed as not pressed.
4.Refund of Court Fees, as per Rules.
(B.P.COLABAWALLA,J.)
(AKIL KURESHI,J.)
….
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.