In Itxa/1542/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -7, Mumbai v. M/S Rohil Zinc Ltd., Mumbai, the High Court (2009) decided the matter.
Decision: Appeal is, therefore, dismissed in limine with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
The Commissioner of Income-tax-,
... Appellant.
M/s.Rohil Zinc Ltd.... Respondent.
P.S.Sahadevan with Suresh Kumar for the appellant.
None for the respondent.
P.C. :
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2.The question sought to be raised in this appeal is has been restored by the Tribunal for consideration afresh. In this view of the matter, we see no substantial question of law involved in this appeal. Appeal is, therefore, dismissed in limine with no order as to costs.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue