Itxa/155/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Bombay,City- Xiii v. Nupur International Bombay
High Court
24 Jan 2005 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/155/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Bombay,City- Xiii v. Nupur International Bombay
Date of order
24 Jan 2005
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itxa/155/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Bombay,City- Xiii v. Nupur International Bombay, the High Court (2005) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In view thereof appeal stands dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARYORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.155 OF 2004
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.155 OF 2004
The Commissioner of Income-tax ..Appellant.
V/s.
Nupur International ..Respondent.
Mr.R.V.Desai, senior counsel with Pankaj Kapoor for
appellant.
CORAM : S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED : 24TH JANUARY, 2005.
CORAM : S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 24TH JANUARY, 2005.
P.C. :-
1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant.
Perused the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal,
Mumbai Bench, SMC-I, Mumbai dated 29/8/2001. It appears
that the assessee has accepted the liability of taxation
and thereafter a penalty proceedings seems to have been
initiated. Our High Court has also concluded that
conditional admission of the assessee cannot be made basis
for penalty. Therefore, there is no substantial question
of law raised in this appeal. In view thereof appeal
stands dismissed.
(S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)
(S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.