Itxa/1559/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-23,Mum v. M/S Mahalaxmi Chemicals Works
High Court
15 Jul 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/1559/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-23,Mum v. M/S Mahalaxmi Chemicals Works
Date of order
15 Jul 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Itxa/1559/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-23,Mum v. M/S Mahalaxmi Chemicals Works, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1559 OF 2007
The Commissioner of Income Tax-23,.Mumbai...AppellantV/s.Mahalaxmi Chemical Works, Mumbai...Respondent
Mr.Abhay Ahuja a/w. Mr.P.S. Sahadevan, Advocates, forthe Appellant. .None for the Respondent.
CORAM : DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN &A.V. NIRGUDE, JJ.DATE : 15TH JULY, 2008.
P.C. :
.Heard the learned Counsel for the Appellant.
2.The learned Counsel for the Appellant seeksleave to withdraw the above Appeal in view of thejudgment of Sudarshan Chemical Industries Ltd. [245ITR 769] which has been affirmed by the Hon’ble SupremeCourt in the case of CIT V/s. Laxmi Machine Works [290ITR 667] as the issue has been covered against theRevenue and in favour of the assessee.
4.Permissible Court fees be refuned to theAppellant as per rules.
: 2 :
[A.V. NIRGUDE, J.] [DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.]
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue