Case Law › High Court › Itxa/1571/2010 Of The Commissioner Of In...

Itxa/1571/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -11,Mumbai v. Pramod Chakravorty Thru L/H Laxmi P. Chakravorty

High Court 07 Apr 2008 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

07 Apr 2008

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Itxa/1571/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -11,Mumbai v. Pramod Chakravorty Thru L/H Laxmi P. Chakravorty, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: P.C. :- P.C. :- In view of the dismissal of the Notice of Motion, Appeal also stands dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARYORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG) NO.1979 OF 2007 INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG) NO.1979 OF 2007 The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant. V/s. Mr.Pramod Chakravorty ..Respondent. Mr.A.D.Kango for appellant. Mr.S.S.Shetty with Hiro Rai for respondent. CORAM : DR. S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. CORAM : DR. S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 7TH APRIL, 2008. DATED : 7TH APRIL, 2008. P.C. :- P.C. :- In view of the dismissal of the Notice of Motion, Appeal also stands dismissed. (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.