Itxa/1572/2016 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-Central -I v. Jitendra M Doshi
High Court
28 Jan 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/1572/2016 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-Central -I v. Jitendra M Doshi
Date of order
28 Jan 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itxa/1572/2016 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-Central -I v. Jitendra M Doshi, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 3.Accordingly, all these Appeals are dismissed as not pressed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
Priya Soparkar
165,69 to 71, 73 itxa 730-16-o
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.730 OF 2016
The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-14… Appellant
V/s.
Shri Minesh D. Shah
… Respondent
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1572 OF 2016WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1579 OF 2016WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1581 OF 2016WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1585 OF 2016WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1622 OF 2016
Pr.Commissioner of Income Tax-Central-1.… Appellant
V/s.Shri Jitendra M. Doshi
… Respondent
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.41 OF 2018WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.166 OF 2018
Pr. Commissioner of Income-Tax, Central-1.… Appellant
V/s.
Rolta Shares & Stocks P. Ltd.
… Respondent
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1189 OF 2018
Pr. Commissioner of Income-Tax-11
V/s.Rustomjee Buildcon Pvt. Ltd.
… Appellant
… Respondent
Priya Soparkar
265,69 to 71, 73 itxa 730-16-o
---
Mr.Suresh Kumar for the Appellants.
Mr.Sameer Dalal i/by Mr.Sudhakar Lakhani for the Respondentin ITXA Nos.1572 of 2016, 1579 of 2016, 1581 of 2016, 1585 of2016 and 1622 of 2016.
Mr.Atul Jasani for the Respondent in ITXA Nos.41 of 2018 and166 of 2018.
---
CORAM : AKIL KURESHI AND SANDEEP K. SHINDE, JJ.
DATE : JANUARY 28, 2019.
P.C.:-
1.These Appeals under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961(the Act) challenge the orders passed by the Income Tax AppellateTribunal (the Tribunal).
2.Mr.Suresh Kumar, learned Counsel appearing for the Revenuestates that he has been instructed not to press these appeals. This forthe reason that the tax effect in each of these appeals is less thanRs.50 lakhs as provided in CBDT Circular No.3 of 2018 dated 11[th]July, 2018.
3.Accordingly, all these Appeals are dismissed as not pressed.
4.Refund of Court Fees, as per Rules.
(SANDEEP K. SHINDE,J.)
(AKIL KURESHI,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.