Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/1580/2017 Of Pr. Commissioner Of In...

Itxa/1580/2017 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax -27 v. Supriya Suhas Joshi

High Court 09 Jan 2020 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/1580/2017 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax -27 v. Supriya Suhas Joshi
Date of order
09 Jan 2020
Assessment year(s)
2008-09, 2009-10
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itxa/1580/2017 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax -27 v. Supriya Suhas Joshi, the High Court (2020) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The Appeal is accordingly dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

JPP IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1580 OF 2017 The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax – 27… Appellant V/s. Supriya Suhas Joshi ... Respondent Mr. N.C. Mohanty for the Appellant Mr. Ruturaj Gurjar for the Respondent CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR & M.S. KARNIK, JJ. DATE : 09 JANUARY 2020. P.C.:- Heard learned Counsel for the parties. 2. The Appeal pertains to the Assessment Year 2008-09. 3.This Appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act,1961 challenges the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal(Tribunal) dated 30 August 2016. 4.The Tribunal has, in the impugned order made thefollowing observations :- “ We find that the assessments for the above mentionedthree A.Ys. were reopened on the basis of the assessmentcompleted for the A.Y. 2009-10, that the Tribunal haddismissed the appeal filed by the AO for that year.Respectfully, following the order of the Tribunal for thesubsequent A.Y., we decide the effective grounds ofappeal against the AO for all the three A.Ys.” 5.As far as the Assessment Year 2009-10 referred to in theabove quoted passage which decision has been followed, theAppellant – Revenue had filed an Income Tax Appeal No. 382 of2017 and it is an admitted position at the bar that this issue has beenheld against the Appellant – Revenue. An order dated 12 April2019 in the Income Tax Appeal No. 382 of 2017 is placed on record. 6.In these circumstances, no substantial question of lawarises. The Appeal is accordingly dismissed. M.S. KARNIK, J. Digitally signedby Jyoti P.JyotiPawarP.Date:2020.01.13Pawar16:20:02+0530 NITIN JAMDAR, J.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan