Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/1582/2016 Of Pr. Commissioner Of In...

Itxa/1582/2016 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax - 5 v. Malabar Hill Club Ltd

High Court 13 Dec 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/1582/2016 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax - 5 v. Malabar Hill Club Ltd
Date of order
13 Dec 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itxa/1582/2016 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax - 5 v. Malabar Hill Club Ltd, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: 3.Accordingly, all these Appeals are dismissed as not pressed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

Priya Soparkar150,51, 62, 63,65, 68, 69,72 n 78 itxa-o IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1577 OF 2016 WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1582 OF 2016 Pr.Commissioner of Income Tax-5 V/s. M/s Malabar Hill Club Ltd. … Appellant … Respondent WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.761 OF 2017 Pr.Commissioner of Income Tax-21… Appellant V/s. Mr.Gurunath Madhav Kher … Respondent WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.783 OF 2017 Pr.Commissioner of Income Tax-17 V/s. Auto Finance Enterprises … Appellant … Respondent WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1054 OF 2017 Pr.Commissioner of Income Tax-8 V/s.M/s Siemens Technology Services Pvt. Ltd. … Appellant … Respondent WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1464 OF 2017 Pr.Commissioner of Income Tax-21 V/s.Ashwin Narendra Lodha … Appellant … Respondent Priya Soparkar 2 50,51, 62, 63,65, 68, 69,72 n 78 itxa-o WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1502 OF 2017 Pr.Commissioner of Income Tax-7 V/s.Power Master Engineers Pvt. Ltd. … Appellant … Respondent WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2679 OF 2017 Pr.Commissioner of Income Tax-20 V/s. Meghayields … Appellant … Respondent WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL(L) NO.1365 OF 2018 Pr.Commissioner of Income Tax-30… Appellant V/s.Yogen D. Sanghvi … Respondent --- Mr.Sham Walve for the Appellants.Mr.Ashok Boghani i/by M/s Ashok Boghani & Co. for theRespondent in ITXA No.761 of 2017. Mr.Atul Jasani for the Respondent in ITXA No.1054 of 2017.Mr.B.V.Jhaveri for the Respondent in ITXA No.1464 of 2017.Mr.Jitendra Singh for the Respondent in ITXA No.1502 of 2017. --- CORAM : AKIL KURESHI AND M.S.SANKLECHA, JJ. DATE : DECEMBER 13, 2018. P.C.:- 1.These Appeals under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 Priya Soparkar 350,51, 62, 63,65, 68, 69,72 n 78 itxa-o (the Act) challenge the orders passed by the Income Tax AppellateTribunal (the Tribunal). 2.Mr.Sham Walve, learned Counsel appearing for the Revenuestates that he has been instructed not to press these appeals. This forthe reason that the tax effect in each of these appeals is less thanRs.50 lakhs as provided in CBDT Circular No.3 of 2018 dated 11[th]July, 2018. 3.Accordingly, all these Appeals are dismissed as not pressed. 4.Refund of Court Fees, as per Rules. (M.S.SANKLECHA,J.) (AKIL KURESHI,J.) ….
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan