Itxa/1585/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax City 16, Mumbai v. M/S Shakti Steels
High Court
11 Apr 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/1585/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax City 16, Mumbai v. M/S Shakti Steels
Date of order
11 Apr 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itxa/1585/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax City 16, Mumbai v. M/S Shakti Steels, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: P.C. :- P.C. :- In view of the dismissal of Notice of Motion, the appeal also stands dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARYORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG) NO.2494 OF 2007
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG) NO.2494 OF 2007
The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s.Shakti Steels ..Respondent.
Mr.S.M.Shah for appellant.
None for respondent.
CORAM : DR. S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
CORAM : DR. S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 11TH APRIL, 2008.
DATED : 11TH APRIL, 2008.
P.C. :-
P.C. :-
In view of the dismissal of Notice of
Motion, the appeal also stands dismissed.
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue