Itxa/1591/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -12 v. New Maker Chamber Iv Premises Chs Ltd
High Court
06 Feb 2013 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/1591/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -12 v. New Maker Chamber Iv Premises Chs Ltd
Date of order
06 Feb 2013
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itxa/1591/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -12 v. New Maker Chamber Iv Premises Chs Ltd, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: 2In this Appeal by the Revenue, the basic issue is whether the Tribunal was justified in deleting the penalty imposed under Section 271(i)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961?.
Decision: 5 Accordingly, appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1591 OF 2011
The Commissioner of Income Tax-12..Appellant.V/s.M/s. New Maker Chamber IV Premises CHS Ltd...Respondent.
Mr. Suresh Kumar i/b. Ms. P. S. Cardozo, for the Appellant.None for the Respondent.
P.C:-
CORAM: J.P.DEVADHAR & M.S.SANKLECHA,JJ.DATE : 6[th] FEBRUARY, 2013.
Heard.
2In this Appeal by the Revenue, the basic issue is whether the Tribunal was justified in deleting the penalty imposed under Section 271(i)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961?.
3The Counsel for the Revenue states that the quantum addition in the quantum appeal was deleted by the Tribunal by its order dated 23[rd] March, 2010. The Revenue carried the matter in appeal to this Court from Order dated 23[rd] March, 2010 being Income Tax Appeal
S.R.JOSHI
No.5782 of 2010. This Court by order dated 22[nd] March, 2011 dismissed the revenue's appeal in quantum proceedings.
4The impugned order upheld the deletion of penalty under Section 27(1)(c) of the Act in view of dismissal of the quantum appeal by its order dated 23[rd] March, 2010. As this Court has dismissed the revenue's appeal from order dated 23[rd] March, 2010 by order dated 22[nd ]March, 2011, we do not entertain the proposed question of law.
5
Accordingly, appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.
(M.S.SANKLECHA,J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.