Case Law › High Court › Itxa/1606/2013 Of Commissioner Of Income...

Itxa/1606/2013 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-7 v. M/S Palm Springs Estate Pvt. Ltd

High Court 22 Apr 2015 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

22 Apr 2015

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Itxa/1606/2013 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-7 v. M/S Palm Springs Estate Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2015) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

sas IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1606 OF 2013 Commissioner of Income Tax-7, Mumbai..Appellant.V/s.M/s. Palm Springs Estate Pvt. Ltd...Respondent. Mrs.S.V.Bharucha for the appellant. Mr.Hiro Rai with Mr.Subhash S. Shetty for the respondent. CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI AND A.K. MENON, JJ. DATED : 22ND APRIL, 2015 P.C. :- Having heard Mrs.Bharucha, learned counsel appearing for the revenue in support of this appeal, we do not find that the Tribunal's order raises any substantial question of law. The Tribunal has found that the Commissioner referred to the correct legal position. The Tribunal found that the said legal position also applies in the facts and circumstances and the stand of the respondent-assessee. In the circumstances, no substantial question of law arises for our consideration in this appeal. The appeal is dismissed. No order as to costs. (A.K.MENON, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.