Itxa/1613/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Incomer Tax-2 v. Foseco (India) Ltd
High Court
16 Feb 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/1613/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Incomer Tax-2 v. Foseco (India) Ltd
Date of order
16 Feb 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itxa/1613/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Incomer Tax-2 v. Foseco (India) Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: P.C. :- P.C. :- In view of the dismissal of the Notice of Motion, the appeal also stands dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARYORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG) NO.216 OF 2007
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG) NO.216 OF 2007
The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant.
V/s.
Foseco (India) Ltd. ..Respondent.
Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for appellant.
Mr.Sanjee M. Shah for respondent.
CORAM : DR. S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED : 16TH APRIL, 2008.
CORAM : DR. S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 16TH APRIL, 2008.
P.C. :-
P.C. :-
In view of the dismissal of the Notice of
Motion, the appeal also stands dismissed.
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue