In Itxa/1614/2013 Of Madhav Constructions v. Income Tax Officer, Central Thane, the High Court (2015) allowed the appeal.
Decision: In view of this statement of Mr.Naniwadekar, the appeals are allowed to be withdrawn and stand disposed of as such.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
sas
1 itxa1610-13++
Madhav Construction
..Appellant.
V/s.
Income Tax Officer, Central Thane
..Respondent.
Mr.Mihir Naniwadekar for the appellant in all appeals.Mr.Tejveer Singh for the respondent in all appeals.
CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI AND A.K. MENON, JJ. DATED : 22ND APRIL, 2015
P.C. :-
Mr.Naniwadekar submits that in the light of the subsequent developments and particularly because the claim of the assessee has been allowed by the Tribunal and the assessing officer after the remand, nothing survives in these appeals and he may be allowed to withdraw the appeals. In view of this statement of Mr.Naniwadekar, the appeals are allowed to be withdrawn and stand disposed of as such. No order as to costs.
(A.K.MENON, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue