Itxa/1616/2016 Of The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-1 v. Mahalaxmi Infra Projects Ltd
High Court
30 Jan 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/1616/2016 Of The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-1 v. Mahalaxmi Infra Projects Ltd
Date of order
30 Jan 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itxa/1616/2016 Of The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-1 v. Mahalaxmi Infra Projects Ltd, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 3.The Income Tax appeal is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1616 OF 2016
The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-1v/s. Mahalaxmi Infra Projects Ltd.
.. Appellant
.. Respondent
Mr. N.N. Singh for the appellant Mr. Mihir Naniwadekar I/b Alisha Pinto for the respondent
CORAM : AKIL KURESHI &
M.S. SANKLECHA, J.J.
P.C.
DATED : 30[th] JANUARY, 2019
1.The Revenue has filed this appeal to challenge the judgment ofthe Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (“the Tribunal” for short) raisingfollowing substantial question for our consideration :-
“(i)Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the caseand in law, the Tribunal was right in deleting the additions madeby the AO on account of undervaluation of WIP for incomeearned by way of security deposit against material cost u/s153A?”
2.This question relates to the additions made by the AssessingOffice while passing order under Section 153A of the Income Tax Act,
1961. The Tribunal by the impugned judgment held that there was no
incriminating material found during the search in relation to theadditions and the Tribunal, therefore, correctly deleted such additions.
In the result, this question is not entertained.
3.The Income Tax appeal is dismissed.
(M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
(AKIL KURESHI, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.