In Itxa/1617/2016 Of Mercedes Benz Education Academy v. The Income Tax Officer Ward 11(1) Pune, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Priya Soparkar
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1617 OF 2016
Mercedes Benz Education Academy
… Appellant
V/s.
The Income Tax Officer… Respondent
---
Mr.Mihir Naniwadekar with Mr.Rohan Deshpande with Ms.AlishaPinto i/by Mr.Neelabh Shreesh for the Appellant.Mr.Sham Walve for the Respondent.
---
CORAM : AKIL KURESHI AND
M.S.SANKLECHA, JJ.
DATE : JANUARY 30, 2019.
P.C.:-
1.Counsel for the appellant-assessee stated that the assesseehad filed application for rectification before the Income TaxAppellate Tribunal. Such application has been granted. In thatview of the matter, this appeal has become infructuous. Appeal isdisposed of accordingly.
(M.S.SANKLECHA,J.)
(AKIL KURESHI,J.)
….
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue