Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/16/2004 Of The Gandhi Special Tubes...

Itxa/16/2004 Of The Gandhi Special Tubes Ltd v. Jt.commissioner Of Income-Tax

High Court 22 Oct 2007 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/16/2004 Of The Gandhi Special Tubes Ltd v. Jt.commissioner Of Income-Tax
Date of order
22 Oct 2007
Assessment year(s)
1997-98
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itxa/16/2004 Of The Gandhi Special Tubes Ltd v. Jt.commissioner Of Income-Tax, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Issue: P.C. :- P.C. :- The appeal was admitted on the following substantial question of law :- " Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the appellant is liable to pay interest under section 234B and 234C of the Act for the assessment year 1997-98 ? " 2.

Decision: Appeal is disposed of accordingly.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.16 OF 2004 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.16 OF 2004 Gandhi Special Tubes Ltd. ..Appellant. V/s. Jt. Commissioner of Income tax & Anr. ..Respondents. Mr.S.J. Mehta for appellant. Mr.R.Ashokan for respondents. CORAM : F.I.REBELLO ANDJ.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 22ND OCTOBER, 2007. CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 22ND OCTOBER, 2007. P.C. :- P.C. :- The appeal was admitted on the following substantial question of law :- " Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the appellant is liable to pay interest under section 234B and 234C of the Act for the assessment year 1997-98 ? " 2. Similar question was in issue before the Karnataka High Court in Kwality Biscuits Ltd. V/s. Kwality Biscuits Ltd. V/s.Commissioner of Income Tax reported in 243 I.T.R. 519. Commissioner of Income Tax The learned Bench of the Karnataka High Court has answered the issue in favour of the assessee. The - = : 2 : = - Supreme Court against that Judgment, in Civil Appeal Nos.1284 & 1285 of 2001 dismissed the appeal preferred by the revenue. In other words, the law as explained by the Karnataka High Court has now been affirmed by the Supreme Court. 3. Considering the above, in our opinion, the question of law is answered in favour of the assessee and against the revenue. 4. Appeal is disposed of accordingly. (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan