Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/1621/2011 Of The Commissioner Of In...

Itxa/1621/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -2 v. Industind Bank Ltd

High Court 12 Feb 2013 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/1621/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -2 v. Industind Bank Ltd
Date of order
12 Feb 2013
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itxa/1621/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -2 v. Industind Bank Ltd, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Issue: In this Appeal for the Assessment Year 2000-01 by the Revenue, following question has been raised for our consideration:- Whether on the facts and in the circumstance of the case and in law the Tribunal was right in excluding from the total income of the Assessee Company the amount of interest of Rs...

Decision: 4Accordingly, appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1621 OF 2011 The Commissioner of Income Tax-2 ..Appellant.V/s.M/s. Indusland Bank Ltd...Respondent. Mr. Vimal Gupta, Sr. Advocate i/b. Padma Divakar, for the Appellant.Mr. Nishant Thakkar i/b. Mint & Conferers, for the Respondent. P.C:- CORAM: J.P.DEVADHAR & M.S.SANKLECHA,JJ.DATE : 12[th] FEBRUARY, 2013. In this Appeal for the Assessment Year 2000-01 by the Revenue, following question has been raised for our consideration:- Whether on the facts and in the circumstance of the case and in law the Tribunal was right in excluding from the total income of the Assessee Company the amount of interest of Rs.29,36,03,288/- which had accrued, but not fallen due or received?. 2The Counsel for the parties state that the question raised in this Appeal is covered against the Revenue and in favour of the Respondent-Assessee by the decision of this Court in the matter of The S.R.JOSHI1 of 2 Director of Income Tax (International Taxation) v/s. Bank of Bahrain & Kuwait, BSC in Income Tax Appeal No.1738 of 2011 rendered on 5[th ]February, 2013. 3In view of the above, we see no reason to entertain the proposed question of law. 4Accordingly, appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. (M.S.SANKLECHA,J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan