Itxa/162/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 8 ,Mumbai v. M/S Eastern International Hotels Ltd. , Mumbai Ltd., Mumbai

908. 910. ITX 298.09 & 306.09 & 162.09.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 298 OF 2009WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 306 OF 2009WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 162 OF 2009 The Commissioner of Income Tax -8Mumbai.. Appellant v/s. M/s.Eastern International Hotels Ltd.,Mumbai ..Respondent Mr. Arvind Pinto, for the appellantMr.Atul K.Jasani, for the respondent. CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & B.P. COLABAWALLA, J.J. DATED : 01[st] FEBRUARY, 2016. P.C. 1.Income Tax Appeal No. 162 of 2009 is not on board. According to the learned Counsel, issues arising herein are common to the other two appeals listed on board today. At their request, Income Tax Appeal No. 162 of 2009 is also taken up for hearing along with the listed appeals being Income Tax Appeal Nos. 298 of 2009 and 306 of 2009. 2.These Appeals relate to Assessment Years 1999-00 to 2002-03. 3.Mr. Arvind Pinto, learned Counsel appearing for the Revenue invited our attention to Circular No.21 of 2015 issued by the Central 908. 910. ITX 298.09 & 306.09 & 162.09.doc Board for Direct Tax dated 10[th ] December, 2015. In particular, our attention invited to paragraphs 3 and 10 therein which read as under:- “3:-Henceforth, appeals/SLPs shall not be filed in cases where the tax effect does not exceed the monetary limits -given hereunder: It is clarified that an appeal should not be filed merely because the tax effect in a case exceeds the monetary limits prescribed above. Filing of appeal in such cases is to be decided on merits of the case.” “10:-This instruction will apply retrospectively to pending appeals and appeals to be filed henceforth in High Courts/ Tribunals. Pending appeals below the specified tax limits in para 3 above may be withdrawn/not pressed. Appeals before the Supreme Court will be governed by the instructions on this subject, operative at the time when such appeal was filed.” 4.In all these appeals, the tax effect is less than Rs. 20 lakhs as particularised hereunder : 908. 910. ITX 298.09 & 306.09 & 162.09.doc 5.Mr. Arvind Pinto, learned Counsel for the Revenue further states that the impugned order is a common order dealing with 3 Assessment Years. In none of the 3 Assessment Years, the tax effect is in excess of Rs.20 lakhs. Consequently, these appeals are not hit by clause 5 of the Central Board of Direct Taxes' Circular No.21/2015 dated 10[th ]December, 2015. 6.In view of the above, Mr. Arvind Pinto, learned Counsel appearing for the Revenue seeks liberty to withdraw the appeals. 7.Accordingly, Appeals are dismissed as withdrawn. 8.Refund of Court Fees, as per Rules. (B.P. COLABAWALLA, J.) (M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)