Itxa/1623/2013 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central-Iii v. M/S. Apar Industries Ltd
High Court
22 Apr 2015 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/1623/2013 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central-Iii v. M/S. Apar Industries Ltd
Date of order
22 Apr 2015
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itxa/1623/2013 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central-Iii v. M/S. Apar Industries Ltd, the High Court (2015) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
sas
1 itxa1623-13
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1623 OF 2013
Commissioner of Income Tax-III, Mumbai..Appellant.V/s.M/s. Apar Industries Ltd...Respondent.
..Respondent.
Mr.A.N. Kotangale, Senior Advocate with Ms. Padma Divakar for the appellant. None for the respondent.
CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI AND A.K. MENON, JJ.
DATED : 22ND APRIL, 2015
P.C. :-
In the light of the judgment and order passed in a
batch of appeals [Commissioner of Income Tax V/s. Contintental Warehousing Corporation (Nhava Sheta) Ltd. in Income Tax Appeal No.523 of 2013 decided on 21st April, 2015] one of which is concerned with the revenue's appeal
against the decision of the Tribunal in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax V/s. M/s. All Cargo Global Logistics Ltd. in Income Tax Appeal No.1969 of 2013 which has been followed and applied. We do not find that the appeal raises any substantial question of law. It is accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs.
(A.K.MENON, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue