In Itxa/1625/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Vi, Mumbai v. M/S Bhoruka Roadlines Ltd. ,Mumbai, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is, therefore, dismissed in limini with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2046 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax
..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s. Bhoruka Roadlines Ltd...Respondent.
Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for appellant.None for respondent.
CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 30TH JUNE, 2009.
P.C. :-
Heard learned counsel for the revenue. He fairly states that issue revolves round the findings of fact recorded by the Tribunal based on the appreciation of evidence. We find no fault with the impugned order. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed in limini with no order as to costs.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue