Itxa/1639/2012 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-20 v. M/S Systematic Exports
High Court
21 Jan 2013 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/1639/2012 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-20 v. M/S Systematic Exports
Date of order
21 Jan 2013
Assessment year(s)
2001-02
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itxa/1639/2012 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-20 v. M/S Systematic Exports, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
sas
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1639 OF 2012
The Commissioner of Income Tax-20, Mumbai
..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s. Systematic Exports
..Respondent.
Mr. Abhay Ahuja for the appellant.
Mr. B.G. Yewale with Sanjiv M. Shah for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND M.S. SANKLECHA, JJ.
DATED : 21ST JANUARY, 2013
P.C. :-
1.In this appeal filed by the revenue relating to assessment year 2001-02, the following questions of law has been proposed to be raised for our consideration:-
“ Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was correct in law in allowing the appeal by holding that the assessee is eligible for deduction for both Section 80IB and 80HHC, disregarding the fact that by virtue of section 80IA(9A)
2.Since the Tribunal has followed the decision of this Court in the matter of Associated Capsules (P) Ltd. V/s. DCIT & Anr. reported in 332 ITR 42, while restoring the matter to the Assessing Officer, we see no reason to entertain the proposed question of law. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.
(M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.