Itxa/1649/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Asian Paints (India) Ltd
High Court
24 Apr 2009 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/1649/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Asian Paints (India) Ltd
Date of order
24 Apr 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Itxa/1649/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Asian Paints (India) Ltd, the High Court (2009) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.1304 OF 2007
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.1304 OF 2007
The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant.
V/s.
Asian Paints (India) Ltd. ..Respondent.
Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for appellant.
Mr.Subhash S. Shetty for respondent.
CORAM : V.C.DAGA ANDJ.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 24TH APRIL, 2009.
CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 24TH APRIL, 2009.
P.C. :-
P.C. :-
1. On the motion made by learned counsel for
the revenue, the appeal is allowed to be withdrawn.
The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with no order as
to costs.
2. Refund of Court fees as per rules.
(V.C.DAGA, J.)
(V.C.DAGA, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue