Itxa/1653/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-13 v. Smt. Jignasha D. Shah
High Court
07 Mar 2017 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/1653/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-13 v. Smt. Jignasha D. Shah
Date of order
07 Mar 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itxa/1653/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-13 v. Smt. Jignasha D. Shah, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 2.Be that as it may, the appeal is dismissed on account of non-prosecution.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1653 OF 2014
The Commissioner of Income Tax-13 v/s.
.. Appellant
Smt. Jignasha D. Shah
.. Respondent
None for the appellantMr. Kalpesh Turalkar for the respondent
CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & A.K. MENON, J.J.
P.C.
DATED : 7[th] MARCH, 2017.
1.None appears for the Revenue in support of the appeal. It appears that the Revenue is not interested in prosecuting the present appeal for the reason that the tax effect involved in the present appeal is Rs.5.54 lakhs as indicated in para 9 of the appeal memo and, therefore, covered by the Central Board of Direct Taxes Circular No.21 of 2015 dated 10[th] December, 2015.
2.Be that as it may, the appeal is dismissed on account of non-prosecution.
(A.K. MENON, J.)
(M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.