Itxa/1655/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-19, Mumbai v. Mariwala Family (
High Court
23 Apr 2009 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/1655/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-19, Mumbai v. Mariwala Family (
Date of order
23 Apr 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itxa/1655/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-19, Mumbai v. Mariwala Family (, the High Court (2009) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Appeal is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LDG.) NO. 1265 OF 2007
The Commissioner of Income-tax-19,Mumbai.
V/s.
Mariwala Family (No.3) TrustTrustees, Mumbai.
... Appellant.
... Respondents.
A.S.Shivsharan for the appellant.
P.S.Pardiwala, senior counsel i/b. Ashok Bhoganiand Co. for the respondent.
CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 23rd April 2009.
P.C. :----
.On the motion made by learned counsel forthe appellant, appellant is allowed to withdraw thisappeal with liberty to take appropriate steps.
Appeal is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn with
no order as to costs.
2.
Needless to mention that the appellant is
entitled to refund of court fee as per law.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(V.C.DAGA J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue