Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/1658/2017 Of The Commissioner Of In...

Itxa/1658/2017 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Tds-1, Mumbai v. Hathway Cable And Datacom Limited

High Court 29 Nov 2021 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/1658/2017 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Tds-1, Mumbai v. Hathway Cable And Datacom Limited
Date of order
29 Nov 2021
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itxa/1658/2017 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Tds-1, Mumbai v. Hathway Cable And Datacom Limited, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

Digitallysigned byGAURIGAURI AMITGAEKWADAMITDate:GAEKWAD2021.11.3011:55:27+0530 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1655 OF 2017WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1658 OF 2017 The Commissioner of Income Tax, TDS -1 ….Appellant V/s. Hathway Cable and Datacom Limited ….Respondent ---- Mr. P.C. Chhotaray for appellant. Mr. B.D. Damodar i/b. Kanga and Company for respondent. ---- CORAM : K.R. SHRIRAM & AMIT B. BORKAR, JJ. DATED : 29[th] NOVEMBER 2021 P.C. : INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1655 OF 2017 WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1658 OF 2017 1Mr. Chhotaray states that the actual tax effect will be less than Rs.1 Crore and therefore, seeks leave of the Court to withdraw the appeals. 2Appeals dismissed as withdrawn. Refund of court fees, if any, in accordance with rules. (AMIT B. BORKAR, J.) (K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan