Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/1658/2018 Of The Commissioner Of In...

Itxa/1658/2018 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Tds -1 v. Destimoney Enterprises Ltd

High Court 08 Jun 2018 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/1658/2018 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Tds -1 v. Destimoney Enterprises Ltd
Date of order
08 Jun 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Itxa/1658/2018 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax,Tds -1 v. Destimoney Enterprises Ltd, the High Court (2018) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: 4.Both the appeals are allowed in the above terms.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 342 OF 2018ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1111 OF 2018 WITHNOTICE OF MOTION NO. 341 OF 2018 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 385 OF 2018 Destimoney Enterprises Ltd. In the matter betweenCommissioner of Income Tax-TDS-1v/s. Destimoney Enterprises Ltd. .. Applicant .. Appellant .. Respondent ALONG WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1111 OF 2018 ANDINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 385 OF 2018 Commissioner of Income Tax-TDS-1.. Appellant v/s.Destimoney Enterprises Ltd. .. Respondent Mr. R. Murlidhar i/b Sameer Dalal for the applicant / orig. respondent Mr. P.C. Chhotary for respondent / orig. appellant. P.C. CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J.J. DATED : 8[th] JUNE, 2018. 1.These two applications have been taken out by the respondent assessee in respect of the appeals filed by the Department for Assessment Years 2008-09 and 2009-10 seeking expeditious disposal of the two appeals. The applicant in its affidavit-in-support of its 342-18-NMA-C-5=.doc application has stated that all the tax dues have been paid and they are not desirous of contesting the appeals of the Revenue. 2.In the above view, both these Notices of Motion are allowed. At the request of the parties, the two appeals i.e. Income Tax Appeal NoS.385 of 2018 and 1111 of 2018 are taken up for consideration. 3.Though the numerous questions of law have been proposed in the two appeals, the same is not to be considered by us. This in view of the fact that the respondent has gone for the voluntary liquidation and the same is stalled because of these pending proceedings. Therefore, the appellant does not want want to contest the two appeals of the Revenue. It is submitted by the appellant revenue that both appeals be allowed and the two orders both dated 23[rd] April, 2015 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) for Assessment Years, 2008-09 and 2009-10 respectively be restored. 4.Both the appeals are allowed in the above terms. (SANDEEP K. SHINDE J.) (M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan