Itxa/1661/2019 Of The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-3, Pune v. Symantec Software India Pvt. Ltd
High Court
26 Nov 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/1661/2019 Of The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-3, Pune v. Symantec Software India Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
26 Nov 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Itxa/1661/2019 Of The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-3, Pune v. Symantec Software India Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.
Decision: In the above view, all these Appeals are disposed of as 3.Refund of Court fees as per Rules.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
JPP
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1280 OF 2017
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-15, Mumbai… Appellant
V/s.
Kalasha Builders Pvt. Ltd.
... Respondent
ALONGWITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL NOS. 1660/2019, 1661/2019, 1770/2019,1777/2019, 1786/2019 and 1790/2019
Mr. Akhileshwar Sharma for the Appellant in ITXA No. 1280/17
Mr. Sham Walve for the Appellants in ITXA Nos. 1660/19,1661/19, 1777/19 and 1790/19.
Mr. N.N. Singh for the Appellant in ITXA No. 1770/19
Mr. P.C. Chhotaray for the Appellants in ITXA Nos. 1786/19
Mr. Ruturaj Gurjar for the Respondent in ITXA No. 1280/17 and1770/19
Mr. Jas Sanghavi for the Respondent in ITXA No. 1786/19
CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & NITIN JAMDAR, JJ.
DATE : 26 NOVEMBER 2019.
P.C.:-
In these Appeals the learned Counsel appearing for theAppellants on instructions seek to withdraw the Appeals. This for
the reason that the tax effect involved in all these Appeals is less thanthe threshold limit provided in the Central Board for Direct Taxes(CBDT) Circular No.17 of 2019 dated 8 August 2019.
2.withdrawn.
In the above view, all these Appeals are disposed of as
3.Refund of Court fees as per Rules.
NITIN JAMDAR, J.
M. S. SANKLECHA, J .
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.