Itxa/1678/2012 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax, Thane - I v. Shri Amarsingh N. Thakur
High Court
10 Dec 2014 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/1678/2012 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax, Thane - I v. Shri Amarsingh N. Thakur
Date of order
10 Dec 2014
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itxa/1678/2012 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax, Thane - I v. Shri Amarsingh N. Thakur, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 3.The Appeals are, therefore, dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1678 OF 2012ANDINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1679 OF 2012
….
Commissioner of Income Tax-1
...Appellant
v/s.
Shri Amarsingh N. Thakur
...Respondent
…
Mr.Sureshkumar for the Appellant.Mr.K.Gopal with Ms.Neha Paranjape and Mr.Jitendra Singh the Respondent.
...
CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI &
A.A. SAYED, JJ.
DATED : 10 DECEMBER 2014
P.C.
These Appeals of the Revenue challenge the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal on 8 June 2012 in Income Tax Appeal No.5358/Mum/2010 and Income Tax Appeal No.5359/Mum/2010 for the Assessment Years 2002-03 and 2004-05.
2.The two questions stated to be substantial question of
law are covered against the Revenue and in favour of the Assessee by the judgment of the this Court, which has been rendered in Income Tax Appeal No.201 of 2012 and connected Appeals, decided on 19 September 2014 (Commissioner of Income Tax-16
itxa-1678-12.doc
v/s. Happy Home Enterprises), to which one of us (S.C.Dharmadhikari, J.) was a party.
3.The Appeals are, therefore, dismissed. No costs.
(A.A. SAYED, J.)
(S.C.DHARMADHIKARI,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.