Itxa/168/2008 Of Thecommissione Rof Income-Tax-Central-Iii,Mum v. M/S Lyka Laboratories Ltd
High Court
31 Jul 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/168/2008 Of Thecommissione Rof Income-Tax-Central-Iii,Mum v. M/S Lyka Laboratories Ltd
Date of order
31 Jul 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itxa/168/2008 Of Thecommissione Rof Income-Tax-Central-Iii,Mum v. M/S Lyka Laboratories Ltd, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.168 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income-tax,
Central - III, Mumbai ..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s.Lyka Laboratories Ltd. ..Respondent.
Mr.Sureshkumar with Mr.B.M. Chatterjee for the
Appellant.
CORAM : D.K. DESHMUKH &
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 31ST JULY, 2008
P.C. :
1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant.
Perused the impugned order.
2. Questions of law (a) and (b) is not
pressed. Only question (c) is argued before us.
Perusal of the order of the tribunal shows that the
decision on the question turns on finding of fact
and the law on the point was not in dispute before
the tribunal. The appeal cannot be entertained.
Hence, rejected.
D.K. DESHMUKH, J.
J.P. DEVADHAR, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue