Itxa/1682/2012 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax - 19 v. M/S. M.r. Shelters
High Court
10 Dec 2014 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/1682/2012 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax - 19 v. M/S. M.r. Shelters
Date of order
10 Dec 2014
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itxa/1682/2012 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax - 19 v. M/S. M.r. Shelters, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 3.The Appeals are, therefore, dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
itxa-1682-12.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1682 OF 2012ANDINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1683 OF 2012
….
Commissioner of Income Tax-19
...Appellant
v/s.
M/s.M.R.Shelters
...Respondent
…
Ms.S.V.Bharucha for the Appellant.Mr.M.Subramanian i/b Vishnu Hadade for the Respondent.
...
CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI &
A.A. SAYED, JJ.
DATED : 10 DECEMBER 2014
P.C.
These Appeals of the Revenue challenge the order
passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “I” Bench on 30 May 2012 in Income Tax Appeal No.2641/Mum/2009 and Income Tax Appeal No.3109/Mum/2009 for the Assessment Years 2005-06 and 2006-07.
2.The two questions stated to be substantial question of law are covered against the Revenue and in favour of the Assessee by the judgment of the this Court, which has been rendered in Income Tax Appeal No.201 of 2012 and connected Appeals, decided on 19 September 2014 (Commissioner of Income Tax-16
2/2
itxa-1682-12.doc
v/s. Happy Home Enterprises), to which one of us (S.C.Dharmadhikari, J.) was a party.
3.The Appeals are, therefore, dismissed. No costs.
(A.A. SAYED, J.)
(S.C.DHARMADHIKARI,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.