Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/1687/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -9,Mumbai v. M/S Sethna Construction P Ltd., Mumbai
Date of order
07 Jul 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
In Itxa/1687/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -9,Mumbai v. M/S Sethna Construction P Ltd., Mumbai, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In this view of the matter, appeal as well as motion stand dismissed in limine with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
The Commissioner of Income-tax-,... Appellant.
M/s.Sethna Construction P.Ltd., Mumbai.... Respondent.
P.S.Sahadevan for the appellant.
P.C. :
Heard learned counsel for the appellant. The delay in filing appeal is about 443 days. Delay has not been explained. No material facts and particulars are to be found in support of the prayer. Even otherwise, in the appeal the order dismissing miscellaneous application has been challenged. This Court has already held that appeal against the order rejecting miscellaneous application is not maintainable. In this view of the matter, appeal as well as motion stand dismissed in limine with no order as to costs.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue