Itxa/170/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Tds) v. M/S. Shah Group Builders Ltd
High Court
24 Nov 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/170/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Tds) v. M/S. Shah Group Builders Ltd
Date of order
24 Nov 2016
Assessment year(s)
2008-09
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itxa/170/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Tds) v. M/S. Shah Group Builders Ltd, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 4.In the above view, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.170 OF 2014
Commissioner of Income Tax (TDS)VersusM/s. Shah Group Builders Ltd.
..Appellant
..Respondent
...........
Mr. A. R. Malhotra a/w N. A. Kazi for the Appellant.Mr. Sameer Dalal for the Respondent.
...........
CORAM: M. S. SANKLECHA & A. K. MENON, JJ.
DATE : 24[th] NOVEMBER, 2016
P.C.:
1.Not on board. Mentioned for withdrawal. Upon mentioning taken up for hearing.
2.This appeal relates to A.Y. 2008-09. This appeal from the ITAT was admitted on 25[th] July, 2016 on the following substantial question of law:-
“Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law,
the Tribunal was correct in holding that the lease premium paid by the lesseee to the lessor was not in the nature of rent as defined in the Explanation (i) to Section 1941 of the Act for the purpose of deduction of tax at source?”
2
3. Mr. Malhotra, the learned counsel appearing for the Revenue states that in view of CBDT Circular no.35 of 2016 dated 13[th] October, 2016 he has been instructed to withdraw the present appeal. that in view of CBDT Circular no.35 of 2016 dated 13[th] October, 2016 he has been instructed to withdraw the present appeal.
4.In the above view, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
5.Refund of Court Fees, as per Rules.
(A. K. MENON, J.)
(M. S. SANKLECHA, J.)
Wadhwa
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.