Itxa/171/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax City-Iii Mumbai v. Western Rolling Mills P.l
High Court
23 Dec 2004 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/171/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax City-Iii Mumbai v. Western Rolling Mills P.l
Date of order
23 Dec 2004
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itxa/171/2004 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax City-Iii Mumbai v. Western Rolling Mills P.l, the High Court (2004) decided the matter.
Decision: The appeal is dismissed in limine.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.171 OF 2004
The Commissioner of Income Tax
Mumbai - III, Mumbai .. Appellant.
V/s.
M/s.Western Rolling Mills P.Ltd. .. Respondent.
Mr.S.V. Bharucha i/b. H.D. Rathod for the appellant.
CORAM : R.M. LODHA, &J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
CORAM : R.M. LODHA, &
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 23RD DECEMBER, 2004.
DATED : 23RD DECEMBER, 2004.
P.C. :
Heard.
2. The controversy raised in this appeal
stands concluded by the Division bench judgment of
this court in the case of Cadell Weaving Mill Co. P.
Limited V/s. CIT, 249 ITR 265. However, the learned
counsel for the revenue submits that the said
judgment is under challenge before the Supreme Court.
Even if that be so, in so far as we are concerned,
the controversy stands concluded by the Division
bench judgment of this court.
3. No substantial question of law arises in
this appeal. The appeal is dismissed in limine.
(R.M. LODHA, J.)
(R.M. LODHA, J.)
2
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue