Itxa/1714/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 5, Mumbai v. M/S Bombay Cycle And Motor Agency Ltd
High Court
16 Apr 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/1714/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 5, Mumbai v. M/S Bombay Cycle And Motor Agency Ltd
Date of order
16 Apr 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itxa/1714/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 5, Mumbai v. M/S Bombay Cycle And Motor Agency Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Appeals stands dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARYORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG) NO.2828 OF 2007
ORDINARY
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG) NO.2828 OF 2007
The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s.Bombay Cycle & Motor Agency Ltd. ..Respondent.
Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for appellant.
Ms.V.B.Patel for respondent.
CORAM : DR. S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED : 16TH APRIL, 2008.
CORAM : DR. S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 16TH APRIL, 2008.
P.C. :-
P.C. :-
P.C. :-
1. By consent of the parties, appeal is taken
up for final hearing. Heard learned counsel for the
appellant and learned counsel for the respondent. The
Tribunal has followed the Judgment of this Court in the
case of CIT V/s. M/s. Bhor Industries Ltd.
CIT V/s. M/s. Bhor Industries Ltd. reported264 I.T.R. 180. Learned counsel for the revenue
in 264 I.T.R. 180
submitted that the revenue has filed the S.L.P.
against the said Judgment which is pending before the
Supreme Court.
2. However, since the Tribunal has followed our
Judgment, we do not find any substantial question of
law arise in this appeal. Appeals stands dismissed
with no order as to costs.
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.