In Itxa/1715/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Mum v. Shri Rajeshkumar P. Jain, the High Court (2008) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Appeal is allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARYORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG) NO.2808 OF 2007
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG) NO.2808 OF 2007
The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant.
V/s.
Shri Rajeshkumar P. Jain ..Respondent.
Mr.S.M.Shah for appellant.
Ms.S.U.Chhabria for respondent.
CORAM : DR. S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 16TH APRIL, 2008.
P.C. :-
P.C. :-
Heard learned counsel for the appellant and
learned counsel for the respondent. As the tax effect
is less than Rs.4 lakhs, learned counsel for the
appellant seeks leave to withdraw the appeal. Appeal
is allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such with
no order as to costs.
2. Permissible Court fees be refunded as per
rules.
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue