Itxa/17/2018 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-3, Mumbai v. Chandragupta Traders Private Limited
High Court
15 Nov 2021 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/17/2018 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-3, Mumbai v. Chandragupta Traders Private Limited
Date of order
15 Nov 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itxa/17/2018 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-3, Mumbai v. Chandragupta Traders Private Limited, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
Digitallysigned byMEERAMEERAMAHESHMAHESHJADHAVJADHAVDate:2021.11.1613:10:47+0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.17 OF 2018
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -3, Mumbai
….Appellant
V/s.Chandragupta Traders Pvt Ltd.
…Respondent
----
Mr. Sham Walve for Appellant
Mr. Raj Darak for Respondent
----
CORAM : K.R. SHRIRAM &
AMIT B. BORKAR, JJ DATED : 15[th] NOVEMBER 2021
P.C. :
1Mr. Walve states respondent has settled the matter under the DirectTax Vivad Se Vishwas Act 2020, and, therefore, seeks leave to withdraw theappeal.Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act 2020, and, therefore, seeks leave to withdraw theappeal.
2Appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
3Refund of court fees, if any, in accordance with rules.
(AMIT B. BORKAR, J)
(K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue