In Itxa/1730/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-Iii,Thane v. Sunil R. Vartak, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Appeal are, therefore, dismissed in limin with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.3009 OF 2007
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.3009 OF 2007
The Comissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant.
V/s.
Shri Sanjay Dattaram Shirke ..Respondent.
AND
AND
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.3010 OF 2007
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.3010 OF 2007
The Comissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant.
V/s.
Shri Sunil R.Vartak ..Respondent.
AND
AND
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.3011 OF 2007
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.3011 OF 2007
The Comissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant.
V/s.
Shri Prakash D. Ghodekar ..Respondent.
Mr.N.R.Prajapati with P.S.Sahadevan for appellant in
all the appeals.
None for respondent.
CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND
CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 8TH MAY, 2009.
DATED : 8TH MAY, 2009.
P.C. :-
P.C. :-
1. Learned counsel for the revenue submits
that the issue sought to be raised in the above
appeals are covered by the judgment of this Court in
the case of C.I.T. V/s. Nagesh Devidas Kulkarni
C.I.T. V/s. Nagesh Devidas Kulkarni[2007] 291 I.T.R. 407 (Bom.). In this
reported in [2007] 291 I.T.R. 407 (Bom.)
view of the matter, no substantial question of law
arise in these appeals. Appeal are, therefore,
dismissed in limin with no order as to costs.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.