In Itxa/1737/2010 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Ii Pune v. Dhareshwar Promoters And Builders, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In this view of the matter, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1737 OF 2010
The Commissioner of Income Tax-II
..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s. Dhareshwar Promoters & Builders..Respondent.
Mr. Vimal Gupta for the appellant.
Mr. Mihir Naniwadekar with Mr.S.N.Inamdar, senior Advocate for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND SMT. R.P.SONDURBALDOTA JJ.
DATED : 14TH JUNE, 2011
P.C. :-
1.Counsel for the parties state that the questions sought to be raised in this appeal are covered against the revenue by the decision of
this Court in the case of CIT V/s. Brahma Associates reported in 333 ITR 289 (Bom). In this view of the matter, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.
(SMT. R.P.SONDURBALDOTA, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue