Itxa/1742/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax- 11 v. M/S. K. S. Aiyar Andco
High Court
24 Nov 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/1742/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax- 11 v. M/S. K. S. Aiyar Andco
Date of order
24 Nov 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itxa/1742/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax- 11 v. M/S. K. S. Aiyar Andco, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 4.Accordingly, both the appeals are dismissed as not pressed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1728 OF 2014WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1742 OF 2014
The Commissioner of Income Tax
v/s.
M/s. K.S. Aiyar & Co.
.. Appellant
..Respondent
Mr. Suresh Kumar for the appellant
Mr. Jintendra Jain a/w Mr. V.Y. Bhate I/b PDS Legal for the respondent
P.C.
CORAM : AKIL KURESHI &
M.S. SANKLECHA, J.J.
DATED : 24[th] NOVEMBER, 2018.
1.These appeals challenge order passed by the Income TaxAppellate Tribunal.
2.Mr. Suresh Kumar, learned Counsel appearing in support of theappeal invites our attention to the Circular No.3/2008 dated 11[th] July,2018 issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes which inter aliadirects the Revenue not to press the pending appeals where the taxeffect is less than Rs.50 lakhs.
3.In view of the above Circular, Mr. Suresh Kumar has beeninstructed not to press the appeals as the tax effect involved in thepresent appeals is less than the threshold limits of Rs.50 lakhs.
4.Accordingly, both the appeals are dismissed as not pressed.
5.Refund of Court Fees as per Rules.
(M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
(AKIL KURESHI, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.