Itxa/1744/2010 Of Director Of Income Tax (Internatioal Taxation), Mumbai v. Clifford Chance Llp, Mumbai
High Court
06 Jul 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/1744/2010 Of Director Of Income Tax (Internatioal Taxation), Mumbai v. Clifford Chance Llp, Mumbai
Date of order
06 Jul 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itxa/1744/2010 Of Director Of Income Tax (Internatioal Taxation), Mumbai v. Clifford Chance Llp, Mumbai, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Both the appeals are, therefore, dismissed in limini with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2883 OF 2008AND
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) OF 2887 OF 2008
The Director of Income Tax (International Taxation)
..Appellant.
V/s.
Cliffort Chance LLP
..Respondent.
Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for appellant.
None for respondent.
CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 6TH JULY, 2009.
P.C. :-
Heard learned counsel for the parties. learned counsel for
the revenue states that the issue sought to be raised in these appeals is squarely covered by the Division Bench judgment of this Court in the case of The Director of Income Tax (International Taxation) V/s. NGC Netwock Asia LLC in Income Tax Appeal No.1037 of 2008 decided on 14th January, 2009. In this view of the matter, no substantial question of law arise in these appeals. Both the appeals are, therefore, dismissed in limini with no order as to costs.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue