Itxa/1757/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-I v. Lap Finance And Consultancy Pvt.ltd
High Court
22 Feb 2017 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/1757/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-I v. Lap Finance And Consultancy Pvt.ltd
Date of order
22 Feb 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itxa/1757/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-I v. Lap Finance And Consultancy Pvt.ltd, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 3.Accordingly, all the three Appeals are dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1664 OF 2014 WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1757 OF 2014 WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1665 OF 2014
The Commissioner of Income Tax-I,
Pune
.. Appellant
v/s.
M/s. Lap Finance and Consultants Pvt. Ltd. .. Respondent
Mr. Tejveer Singh for the appellant
Mr. Rohan Deshpande i/b Mihir Naniwadekar for the respondent
CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & A.K. MENON, J.J.
P.C.
DATED : 22[nd] FEBRUARY, 2017.
1.These three appeals relating to Assessment Years 2004-05, 2005-06 and 2008-09. The issue arising in all the three appeals is :-
“Whether while claiming deduction under Section 80IA of the Act, the assessee has an option to choose the first year from which it would claim deduction for a period of 10 consequent years out of a slab of 15 years or is bound by the first year of commencement of operations as the first year to claim deduction for a period of 10 years?
2.Mr. Tejveer Singh, learned Counsel for the Revenue invites our
attention to the Central Board of Direct Taxes Circular (CBDT) No.1 of
1664-14-itxa-c=.doc
2016, dated 15[th] February, 2016. By the aforesaid circular, the CBDT has clarified that it would be open to an assessee to choose the initial assessment year for the purposes of claiming deduction under Section 80IA(2) of the Act for a continuous period of 10 years from the chosen 'initial (first) assessment year'. Further, the Circular also directs the Officers of the Revenue not to pursue pending litigations on the choice of first year of claiming deduction under Section 80IA of the Act. In view of the above Circular, on instructions, Mr. Tejveer Singh, learned Counsel for the appellant Revenue seeks to withdraw all the three appeals.
3.Accordingly, all the three Appeals are dismissed as withdrawn. Refund of Court fees as per Rules.
(A.K. MENON, J.)
(M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.