In Itxa/1760/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -13 Mumbai v. Milan D. Shah, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: For the reasons stated therein, the present appeals are also dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
sas
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL(LOD) NO.2238 OF 2010 ANDINCOME TAX APPEAL(LOD) NO.2239 OF 2010
The Commissioner of Income Tax-13, Mumbai..Appellant.
V/s.
Shri Milan D. Shah
..Respondent.
Mr. Suresh Kumar for the appellant.
Mr. Prakash Shah i/b. PDS Legal for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND A.A.SAYED, JJ.
DATED : 22ND JULY, 2011
P.C. :-
Counsel for the parties state that similar question raised by
the revenue in the assessee's own case being Income Tax Appeal No.16 of 2011 has been dismissed by us today i.e. 22/7/2011. For the reasons stated therein, the present appeals are also dismissed with no order as to costs.
(A.A. SAYED, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue