Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/1770/2014 Of The Commissioner Of In...

Itxa/1770/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii.pune v. Loknete Balasaheb Desai Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd

High Court 25 Aug 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/1770/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii.pune v. Loknete Balasaheb Desai Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd
Date of order
25 Aug 2022
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Itxa/1770/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii.pune v. Loknete Balasaheb Desai Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

Digitallysigned bySHRADDHASHRADDHAKAMLESHKAMLESHTALEKARTALEKARDate:2022.08.2620:13:53+0530 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1770 OF 2014 The Commissioner of Income Tax-III, PunePMT Building, ‘B’ Wing, 3[rd] Floor,Shankar Sheth Road, Swargate,Pune – 411 037... Appellant Vs.Loknete Balasaheb Desai Sahakari SakharKarkhana Ltd.,A/p. Daulatnagar (Marali),Tal. Patan, Dist. Satara,PAN : AAAAB 0362K .... Respondent**** Mr.Suresh Kumar for appellant.Mr.Ruturaj Gurjar for respondent. CORAM : DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR AND ABHAY AHUJA, JJ. DATE : 25[th] AUGUST 2022 PC : 1.Learned Counsel for the appellant states that the tax effect in the present Appeal is below the limit stipulated in terms of CircularNo.17 of 2019, dated 8[th] August, 2019. It is stated that noinstructions have been received from the Department to withdrawthe present Appeal. 2.In the light of Circular No. 17 of 2019, the Appeal is disposedof as involving low tax effect. 3. However, we observe that in case, the Revenue fnds for somereason that the Appeal was not supposed to have been withdrawn inthe light of the Circular, dated 8[th] August 2019, it would be open tothe Revenue to fle an application/praecipe seeking restoration ofthe Appeal, to be decided on its own merits. Refund of Court-fees asper Rules. [ABHAY AHUJA, J.] [DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, J.]
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan