Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/177/2016 Of Pr Commissioner Of Inco...

Itxa/177/2016 Of Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax 15 v. M/S Indochem Electronic Systems Pvt Ltd

High Court 14 Aug 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/177/2016 Of Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax 15 v. M/S Indochem Electronic Systems Pvt Ltd
Date of order
14 Aug 2018
Assessment year(s)
2009-10
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itxa/177/2016 Of Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax 15 v. M/S Indochem Electronic Systems Pvt Ltd, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

Uday S. Jagtap THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 177 OF 2016 The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-15 .. Appellant v/s. M/s. Indochem Electronic Systems Pvt. Ltd. ..Respondent Mr. Suresh Kumar for the appellant None for the respondent CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J.J. P.C. DATED : 14[th] AUGUST, 2018. 1.This Appeal relates to Assessment Year 2009-10. 2.Mr. Suresh Kumar, learned Counsel appearing for the Revenueinvited our attention to Circular No.3 of 2018 dated 11[th] July, 2018issued by the Central Board for Direct Tax (CBDT). The aboveCircular directs the Officers of the Revenue not to file appeals to theHigh Court where the tax effect does not exceed Rs.50 lakhs. It alsodirects its Officers to withdraw / not press its pending appeals wherethe tax effect is less than Rs.50 lakhs. This, of course, if it does not fallin the excluded class of appeals listed therein. 3.Our attention is invited to para 11 of the Appeal Memo, whichindicates that in this Appeal, the tax effect is Rs. 47.58 lakhs. Digitallysigned byUdayUday ShivajiJagtapShivajiDate:2018.08.20Jagtap18:05:27+0530 Uday S. Jagtap 4.In view of the Circular No.3 of 2018 dated 11[th] July, 2018 issuedby the CBDT, Mr. Suresh Kumar, learned Counsel appearing for theRevenue, on instructions from Mr. Yogendra Chaudhry, Pr.Commissioner of Income Tax-15, Mumbai does not press the presentAppeal. 5.Accordingly, Appeal dismissed, as withdrawn. 6.Refund of Court Fees, if any, as per Rules. (SANDEEP K. SHINDE J.) (M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan