Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/1773/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax City 10,Mumbai v. Landmark Builders Pvt Ltd, Mumbai
Date of order
23 Sep 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
In Itxa/1773/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax City 10,Mumbai v. Landmark Builders Pvt Ltd, Mumbai, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In this view of the matter, the appeal does not raise any substantial question of law and hence the same is dismissed in limini with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1773 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax
..Appellant.
V/s.
Landmark Builders Pvt. Ltd.
..Respondent.
Mr. J.S. Saluja for appellant.
Mr. V.B. Patil for respondent.
CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 23RD SEPTEMBER, 2009.
P.C. :-
Heard learned counsel for the revenue and the respondent. The issue sought in the appeal revolves around appreciation of evidence and
findings of fact recorded therein by the Tribunal. We were also taken through the impugned order and the findings of fact recorded which are based on appreciation of evidence. In this view of the matter, the appeal does not raise any substantial question of law and hence the same is dismissed in limini with no order as to costs.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(V.C.DAGA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue