In Itxa/1819/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-13, Mumbai v. M/S Sadhuram Patel And Sons , Mumbai, the High Court (2009) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: The appeal is dismissed in limini with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1819 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax
..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s. Sadhuram Patel & Sons
..Respondent.
Mr A.S. Shivsharan for appellant.
Mr. J.D. Mistry with Ms. Aasifa Khan for respondent.
CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 17TH NOVEMBER, 2009.
P.C. :-
Heard learned counsel for the revenue and learned counsel appearing for the respondent. The issue sought to be raised in the appeal revolves around the fact that depreciation must be actually claimed and deemed to have been allowed. It has been brought to our notice that the very same issue has been discussed by the Tribunal. We find that the view taken by the Tribunal appears to be reasonable and possible view. No fault can be found in the impugned order In the above view of the matter, no substantial question of law arise in the appeal. The appeal is dismissed in limini with no order as to costs.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(V.C.DAGA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.