Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/1819/2014 Of The Commissioner Of In...

Itxa/1819/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax 8 v. M/S Kec International Ltd

High Court 08 Jun 2017 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/1819/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax 8 v. M/S Kec International Ltd
Date of order
08 Jun 2017
Assessment year(s)
2007-08, 2006-07
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itxa/1819/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax 8 v. M/S Kec International Ltd, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: In the present case also, the question as relied upon for the Assessment Year 2006-07 has been upheld by this Court.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1819 OF 2014 The Commissioner of Income Tax-8v/s. .. Appellant M/s. KEC International Ltd. .. Respondent Mr. Arvind Pinto for the appellant Mr. Atul K. Jasani for the respondent CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA & G.S. KULKARNI, J.J. DATED : 8[th] JUNE, 2017 P.C. 1.The present appeal is filed against the order of the Tribunal in respect of the Assessment Year 2007-08. The learned Counsel for the respondent submits that in respect of the assessment for the year 2006-07 against the order of the Tribunal, the Revenue had filed an appeal before this Court bearing Income Tax Appeal No.40 of 2011. The same has been dismissed under order dated 7th February, 2013 and the substantial questions raised in the present appeal were substantial questions (c) to (e) in the appeal bearing Income Tax Appeal No.40 of 2011. 2.The learned Counsel for the appellant on going through the order passed in Income Tax Appeal No.40 of 2011 accedes to the said facts. In the present case also, the question as relied upon for the Assessment Year 2006-07 has been upheld by this Court. 3.It is further submitted that the order of this Court passed in Income Tax Appeal No.40 of 2011 was assailed before the Apex Court and the Apex Court has dismissed the SLP. 4.In the light of the above, no substantial question of law arises. The appeal is dismissed. No order as to costs. (G.S. KULKARNI, J.) (S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan